Like us on Facebook (don't let them censor another conservative site!):

Stupidest media headline? NYT: Spy not spying on Trump or Wapo: Spy was to protect Trump?

It’s really kind of funny watching the corrupt media try to spin the fact that the Obama regime actually placed a spy (who is likely Stephan Halper) in the 2016 Trump campaign. Now we have left wing media fish wraps competiting for the absolute dumbest excuses ever for the Obama spy.

The New York Times comes first (via uber hack Maggie Haberman):

Yea, the FBI and CIA put a plant (probably Stephan Halper) in the Trump campaign, but it wasn’t for “spying” purposes, only to investigate. Yea. ok

And then you have the Falmer Jeff Bezos Washington Post coming up with an equally dumb, and maybe even dumber head that the Obama mole instead the Trump campaign was there to “protect” Trump, not spy on him.

Stupidest media headline? NYT: Spy not spying on Trump or Wapo: Spy was to protect Trump?
Stupidest media headline? NYT: Spy not spying on Trump or Wapo: Spy was to protect Trump?

Pick your favorite stupid media head. The spy was placed in the Trump campaign, not to spy or the spy placed in the Trump campaign was there to “protect” Trump. Just when you think you’ve heard it all, the media surprises you yet again.