You know, I bash Greasy Gavin Newsom a lot on this page and social media, but maybe he isn’t really the bad one… Maybe it’s his batshit crazy wife who gives her boys dolls to play with so that they don’t stay on their gender path or something.. Now Harvey Weinstein’s side piece wants legislation to prevent young boys from becoming right-wing, or “less progressive”.
As bad as “Michelle” Obama and “Doctor” Jill Biden were, this loony bin would be the absolute worst ever in the White House, God forbid.
Late last month, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s (D-CA) wife appeared at something called the Common Sense Summit on Kids and Families in San Francisco and bragged about coming legislation that will force tech companies to “be a force for good” when it comes to stopping boys from becoming Republican-curious.
Of course, “a force for good” will be Gavin and Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s definition of “good,” which means that queering and transing kids is a virtue while conservative beliefs become illegal.
California’s obnoxious and authoritarian “first partner” assured the assembled group that she was only referring to Andrew Tate, but we all know how this works, where it all leads, and that the slippery slope is a very real thing when it comes to Democrats. For example, in 2008, Barack Obama said he opposed same-sex marriage. A mere 12 years later, Democrats were already permanently sterilizing and mutilating kids, hosting drag queen story hours at public libraries, and filling elementary schools with gay porn.
Anyone who thinks the Gruesome Newsoms will stop at censoring Andrew Tate is either an idiot or a liar. But if you listen closely, she’s already admitting this legislation will go waaaaay beyond Tate, which would be bad enough. I’m no Andrew Tate fan, but I dislike censorship even more.