Like us on Facebook (don't let them censor another conservative site!):

Jayden Fryberg used father’s gun – no gun law could have prevented shooting

Jayden Fryberg used father’s gun, a Beretta .40-caliber handgun during his shooting at Marysville-Pilchuck High School near Seattle. He killed one female, and himself. Three others are in critical condition in the hospital. As usual, leftists have politicized the shooting calling more restrictions on guns. It’s the typical left wing bullsh*t we hear whenever there’s a shooting. But yet again, the leftists can’t grasp reality. No extended gun law, aside from taking away guns from legal owners would have stopped this shooting at Marysville-Pilchuck High School. The gun wasn’t purchased by Jayden Fryberg, his father had no past criminal history. Oh, and it was just a handgun used this time, so we don’t get the ‘assault weapon ban’ bs from the media this time.

Jayden Fryberg used father's gun - no gun law could have prevented shooting
Jayden Fryberg used father’s gun – no gun law could have prevented shooting

Basically, like the mass shooting at Newtown, where Adam Lanza used his mother’s gun, no gun laws, aside from banning civilians from owning guns could have prevented today’s event. If you want to live in a country where guns are banned, leftists should leave this country and move to some Communist or socialist utopia like Cuba.

No matter how much progressive liberal extremists want to trample on the constitution and politicize events they always fail. This was a murder/suicide by a young boy why generally had no known mental issues and was quite popular in school. He wasn’t an outcast like Adam Lanza, Jared Loughner, or other mass shooters.

If we are going to ban all things that kill, are we going to ban axes in New York after last nights terrorist attacks?

Shall we ban spoons for making Michael Moore a fat pig?