Both Khizr Khan and Pat Smith lost their son’s due to Muslim terrorism. Khizr Khan’s son was killed in Iraq in 2004 (the war Hillary Clinton voted for). Pat Smith’s son died in 2012 after being left to die with three other Americans, including the Ambassador to Libya. Neither Khan, nor Smith deserve to have to lost their sons, no matter what their political ideologies are. But there is a big difference between Khizr Khan and Pat Smith. And that is how they’ve been treated by the media, Hillary Clinton and progressives in general.
| What difference at this point does it make? Khizr Khan Vs Pat Smith |
|---|
|
Pat Smith has been ridiculed for speaking about her son’s death on cable news shows and at the RNC convention. Khizr Khan was been hailed as some sort of hero after speaking in favor of Hillary Clinton and politicizing the death of his son from twelve years ago. Khan’s son died in 2004, so where was he in 2008 and 2012?
The bottom line is this. Hillary Clinton has blood on her hands for the death of Kahn and Smith. One family is celebrated by the corrupt media and one is smeared. There’s something wrong here when both families don’t get equal sympathy for losing their son.