Like us on Facebook (don't let them censor another conservative site!):

#NeverTrump National Review now saying Rosenstein botched Mueller probe

You’ve got two snakes a top the DOJ. Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein. Jeff Sessions is basically there as a crusader against pot, and Rosenstein is there botching the Mueller probe that Democrats and the media has invested so much in. Even #NeverTrump magazine National Review is now bashing Rosenstein for “botching” the Mueller probe. Today was a very bad today for the witch hunters Mueller, Rosenstein and crew.. #NeverTrumpers like National Review are now trying to distance themselves from the man they once rooted for. The article is written by NeverTrump hack Rich Lowry who bragged about Carly Fiorina “cutting off Trump’s balls” during a GOP debate in 2016. Lowry, the NeverTrump hack is even calling for Rosenstein’s removal. Suck it National Review. You hacks own Rod Rosenstein and Robert Mueller. You cheer lead for them just like you did Jeb Bush. No wonder you have no credibility left and are losing subscribers.

#NeverTrump National Review now saying Rosenstein botched Mueller probe
#NeverTrump National Review now saying Rosenstein botched Mueller probe

Neglecting to place restrictions on the Mueller investigation is grounds for his removal.
Rod Rosenstein is doing a star turn as principled defender of the law, but he’s performed abysmally as deputy attorney general, and President Donald Trump would be fully justified in firing him.

The leaked questions that special counsel Robert Mueller wants to ask Trump in a prospective deposition are, if accurate, a sign that Mueller has spun out of control on Rosenstein’s watch.

The questions (drafted by Trump’s legal team after consultations with Mueller’s investigators) suggest a free-floating investigation of the president’s motives, undertaken by a subordinate of the president. This is unlike any special-counsel investigation we’ve ever seen and represents a significant distortion of our system.

Per the questions, Mueller wants to know how Trump reacted to news stories in the Washington Post. What he thought of FBI director James Comey during the transition. How he feels about his attorney general.

These questions grow out of an obstruction-of-justice probe centered, as far as we can tell, on Trump’s exercise of the legitimate powers of the presidency. Mueller is out to prove that Trump had ill intentions. But this is an inherently problematic inquiry that involves a subordinate second-guessing the president on highly political questions.