Like us on Facebook (don't let them censor another conservative site!):

Mueller denies he planned to charge Trump with three counts of obstruction

The witch hunt that just wouldn’t die got a new twist today. According to Michael Wolff’s upcoming book, “Siege: Trump Under Fire,” the Mueller witch hunt team had planned to draw up a three charge indictment against Trump for obstruction of justice. Left wing Brit paper The Guardian claims to have seen the actual document which with “influencing, obstructing or impeding a pending proceeding,” “tampering with a witness, victim or informant” and “retaliating against a witness, victim or informant”. The Mueller witch hunt office has denied that this was the case or that the documents even exist, so as usual someone is lying here. Eventually Mueller and his team of Hillary Clinton sycophants decided to table the charges and instead release what they did. Personally, I think the media and Wolff are the liars here. Does anyone honestly thing the Mueller witch hunt gang would table a charge against Trump if they could make one?

Mueller denies he planned to charge Trump with three counts of obstruction
Mueller denies he planned to charge Trump with three counts of obstruction

According to Helmore, Wolff reports that Mueller’s office planned to charge the president with “influencing, obstructing or impeding a pending proceeding,” “tampering with a witness, victim or informant” and “retaliating against a witness, victim or informant” but eventually decided to “shelve” it. While The Guardian reporter says he viewed the document, Mueller’s office denies that it even exists.

“The documents described do not exist,” Mueller spokesman Peter Carr told Fox News.

LIBERAL MEDIA FINALLY TURNING ON ‘DISGRACEFUL’ ANTI-TRUMP AUTHOR MICHAEL WOLFF

Wolff was accused of misrepresenting his levels of access and fabricating events for “Fire and Fury,” and it appears “Siege” will face similar accusations as Mueller’s team claims a key document isn’t authentic.

The Special Counsel’s report did not make a traditional prosecutorial judgment on the obstruction investigation and did not try to determine whether or not the president committed a crime, so documents claiming otherwise are presumably fabrications.