Like us on Facebook (don't let them censor another conservative site!):

Left wing rag Newsweek goes birther against Kamala Harris (she’s that bad)

The left wing media is lining up for a BJ from Kamala Harris, but the hard left hates her, even though she’s one of them. She’s a phony, fraud, unlikable and and all around nasty person. Now left wing filth rag Newsweek is going birther against Kamala Harris. She’s basically an anchor baby. Born in this country to immigrant parents from India and Jamaica in the 1960’s in Oakland, California. I don’t know enough about the 12th and 14th Amendment to go full birther like Newsweek, let them do it for you. It’s really quite funny.

Left wing rag Newsweek goes birther against Kamala Harris (she’s that bad)

The fact that Senator Kamala Harris has just been named the vice presidential running mate for presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has some questioning her eligibility for the position. The 12th Amendment provides that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.” And Article II of the Constitution specifies that “[n]o person except a natural born citizen…shall be eligible to the office of President.” Her father was (and is) a Jamaican national, her mother was from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris’ birth in 1964. That, according to these commentators, makes her not a “natural born citizen”—and therefore ineligible for the office of the president and, hence, ineligible for the office of the vice president.

“Nonsense,” runs the counter-commentary. Indeed, PolitiFact rated the claim of ineligibility as “Pants on Fire” false, Snopes rated it simply “False,” and from the other side of the political spectrum, Conservative Daily News likewise rated it “False.” All three (and numerous others) simply assert that Harris is eligible because she was born in Oakland—and is therefore a natural-born citizen from location of birth. The 14th Amendment says so, they all claim, and the Supreme Court so held in the 1898 case of U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark.