Like us on Facebook (don't let them censor another conservative site!):

USA Today: There Is ‘No Simple Answer’ for Defining What Is a Woman

I’m not a biologist, but I have a pretty good sense as to what a woman is. Kentanji Brown-Jackson didn’t want to answer the question hen asked by Marcia Blackburn. Brown Jackson knows, she’s not stupid. She just was too afraid to go against her communist left wing Democrat base. So as you would expect, the media is running to defend Brown-Jackson. The USA Today even went so far as to say there is “no simple answer’ for defining what is a woman.

Actually yea, it is pretty simple. You are born with a set of chromosomes. XY for males, XX for females. Trust the science! You may want to change your sex if you are into that type of stuff, but the science doesn’t lie. Yet the USA Today isn’t a bit confused.

As part of the left’s relentless and stomach-churning attempt to redefine gender and sex, USA Today reacted in a piece Thursday to Republican Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn asking Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to define “what is a woman” by insisting “science says there’s no simple answer” or “sufficient way” to identify whether someone’s a woman.

In other words, forget one’s genitalia and genetics as anyone can be a woman. And, as the piece argued, you’re not only sexist to question it, but it’s the latest incarnation of insulting women dating back to slavery.

Reporter Alia E. Dastagir found it worthy of going down this road in an article from the paper’s “Health & Wellness” section with this headline: “Marsha Blackburn asked Ketanji Brown Jackson to define ‘woman.’ Science says there’s no simple answer.”